Shop More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
December 27, 2013
Image Size
236 KB
Resolution
800×530
Submitted with
Sta.sh
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
437
Favourites
40 (who?)
Comments
12

Camera Data

Make
NIKON CORPORATION
Model
NIKON D7000
Shutter Speed
30/1 second
Aperture
F/13.0
Focal Length
32 mm
ISO Speed
100
Date Taken
Dec 22, 2013, 2:58:30 PM
Software
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh)
×
Energy by ZerberuZ Energy by ZerberuZ
the beauty of the nuclear power ... do we need it ?
Add a Comment:
 
:iconengineerjr:
engineerJR Featured By Owner Jan 3, 2014
that is Cattenom, right?
Reply
:iconzerberuz:
ZerberuZ Featured By Owner Jan 3, 2014
yes it is Cattenom :)
Reply
:iconengineerjr:
engineerJR Featured By Owner Jan 3, 2014
i knew it^^
Reply
:iconzerberuz:
ZerberuZ Featured By Owner Jan 3, 2014
;)
Reply
:iconimpromptus:
impromptus Featured By Owner Dec 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Extreme impact. Both the photo and the question. In my humble opinion, yes, until we can't generate high efficiency yields from "green" power (we're almost there with wind, but still a long way to go with solar), I believe, if well taken care of, nuclear power is the immediate solution. We can't survive on fossil fuels much longer, and Nuclear Fusion, as I see it, has still a lot to show for it self (it is still not cost-effective to heat a hidrogen-rich mix in order to trigger the fusion reaction of the sun (H+H -> He (alpha particle) + Neutron).
My hopes resides on the recycling of Nuclear Waste - There are good signs that, for example, radioactive Cesium-135 and Cesium-137 can be recycled into a subsequent nuclear reaction, which would yield much lighter elements and much less dangerous.
Reply
:iconzerberuz:
ZerberuZ Featured By Owner Dec 27, 2013
Thank you very much for this great comment. 
I personally think that not only "green" power will be the power for the future, since the energy consumption of our civilisation will grow with the density of the society itself, i doubt that only "green" power will be enough.
I don't know if you ever heard about "Thorium-Reactors"
Imho it would be a great replacement for the traditional reactors . 
Reply
:iconimpromptus:
impromptus Featured By Owner Dec 27, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Couldn't agree more.

I didn't mention the Thorium reactors as I consider them just an "incremental" leap over the standard fission reactors; not a breakthrough.
The principle is the same (controlling a cascading chain reactor of nuclear fission of radioactive elements), so, the greatest danger still lies there:
Whereas in a Fusion reactor, you can just pull the plug and the reaction immediately stops, in a fission facility, it can take years or even decades to shutdown one reactor.
Furthermore, building a Nuclear fission reactor from scratch which is a technology that we already master for more than 30 years still takes over a decade.
If we start building a commercial Thorium reactor whenever it is deemed feasible (unfortunately, Thorium cannot be weaponized, so the motivation to put funding on research is low), we would only see one in operation, in my opinion, in 30 years or so...
Reply
:iconzerberuz:
ZerberuZ Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2013
True, even with Thorium reactors, there will still be some nuclear and toxic waste to store for some hundreds of years, But not as much as a conventional reactor will produce, so basically the nuclear and toxic waste can be reduced with Thorium reactors.
But to be honest , did you ever see those giant and ugly wind parks ? the natural environment is partly destroyed with it. Water power has the same issue of nature destruction. Of shore Windparks, have issues during the construction and The most "green power" devices are just to big compared to the output power. You need more than 100 Wind Wheels for 500MW power. 
Solar parks like the one in Spain can't be used in countries like Germany or Norway to the same extend.
The Geographical question is another issue for "Green Power". 


Reply
:iconimpromptus:
impromptus Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2013  Hobbyist Photographer
Agree completely. Here in Portugal we have the luck of having a very large west-faced coastline. We are getting around 40% of our electricity from the Wind turbines. And yes, we have around up to a thousand wind wheels and yes, they are ugly as hell. I find them better though than the water dams that we have that completely destroy the surrounding ecossystem. At least the wind turbines have a lower ecological footprint (and in the long run, they pay themselves off very quickly in terms of CO2 footprint and investment).
Reply
:iconzerberuz:
ZerberuZ Featured By Owner Jan 3, 2014
I wish you a happy new year, and all the best for 2014. 

And i completely agree, they might be ugly and we need a lot of those wind turbines, but still better than a nuclear plant or water dams. 
Unfortunately Luxembourg is geographically a mess for green power, so we have to get most of our power from "apparently" green resources from Germany, but i doubt that there's no nuclear or coal based power involved, only the electricity providing company knows the truth. 
Reply
Add a Comment: